Karren Brady has been defending herself on social media after being drawn into a row on her earnings insisting that she has taken a 30 per cent pay cut to her £898,000 salary to ease the financial burden on West Ham United.
Below you can follow to to-ings and fro-ings of her face-off with her opponent who was particularly keen to involve her in a confrontation in which she goes into some detail about her salary.
With no date for restarting the league, this is having severe financial implications,’ she had written.
‘They seem to suggest that the players taking a pay cut means the money somehow goes into the owners pockets which is totally ridiculous.’
Her stance was called into question by one user, and Brady felt the need to respond after being asked if she was taking a cut herself and being told that her ‘hypocrisy was mind blowing’.
‘Yes I am,’ she responded. ‘Reduced by 30% so I can help ensure my staff are paid 100%. What about you?’The West Ham vice-chair has slammed the PFA for their stance during the coronavirus crisis
The user @johnopenfold hit back again to ask: ‘So you’re still taking approx £700k for a part time job that you’re not very good at then?’, to which Brady responded by refuting the suggestion her wage is that high.
‘My basic salary is NOTHING like that amount,’ she argued, ‘but even if I was I pay 50% tax on it so I can contribute to the country, the NHS and everyone who needs it, including possibly you.’
West Ham’s accounts for the year up until May 2019 showed that Brady earned £1.136million, with £238,000 of that in bonuses.
Who cares how much she earns? She worked her way there, it’s the salary her job pays and is taxed heavily. She is taking a pay cut so good on her. Would all these detractors say no to her salary?
Regardless of what you think about her. It is a fact that 50% is taxed. And wether you think she should earn that much money, doesn’t change the fact her salary shcontributes a lot to the NHS.
Her salary is presumably compatible for a business leader of her pedigree and I thoroughly agree with her sentiment of taking a cut and paying lower level employees – I call that leadership. Many commenting adversely I would suggest don’t know her job in total – I prefer her openness to the Icelandic or Mr Brown previously. When are we going to support our own?