Last week, you may remember, I ran a story from a trusted source suggesting West Ham would not appoint a director of football if the club remained in the Premier League.
At the time, it was put to me that survival would see Nuno Espírito Santo, alongside his agent Jorge Mendes, continue to oversee recruitment.
Why the story gained traction
Ordinarily, that wouldn’t have been much of a story.
Most fans have been pleased with the January business, which has played a big part in the upturn in form — dragging West Ham out of the relegation zone and turning the tables on Tottenham.
You could even argue it makes sense. After all, who knows a squad’s needs better than the manager?
The issue was timing.
Club stance appears unchanged
On 26 February, when the Fans’ Advisory Board met with vice-chair Karren Brady, they were assured a director of football would be appointed regardless of which division West Ham are in next season.
Following the Claret & Hugh piece, the FAB sought clarification — and as Martin write yesterday, the club responded with the following:
- The media reporting in question does not originate from a club source and is considered speculative
- The position communicated to the FAB on 26 February remains unchanged, namely that a director of football will be appointed at the end of this season
- The club does not intend to issue any further public clarification at this time
Encouraging update — with a hint of caution
My response to that is simple — it’s good news.
Regular readers will know I’m a big advocate of that kind of structure, especially given how well it has worked for other clubs.
That said, I’m not entirely surprised. The club contacted Claret & Hugh directly last week to say much the same thing following the blog.
Source vs club messaging
It’s worth stressing that at no point did I claim the original information came from the club.
The source remains highly trusted and well connected.
But if that information turns out to be wide of the mark, I’ll happily take that outcome because West Ham will be building a better structure. That said, I remain cautious until it happens.
The key detail that really matters
With just six games remaining, the suggestion that a director of football could be appointed before the end of the season is, frankly, exciting.
But — and it’s a big but — the role has to carry real authority.
There’s little point appointing a figurehead if decisions can still be overridden by the manager or David Sullivan.
A line in the sand?
West Ham fans have seen this play out too many times.
Chairman-led deals, agent influence, and a lack of structure have all contributed to inconsistency in recruitment.
If this appointment is done properly — and given genuine power — it could finally signal that those days are behind us.
We’ve already got a DOF (Director of F***k ups), he’s called David Sullivan
And the DoF is…. David Sullivan
Great Comment Gonzo; If there was ever a time for a proper DOF it is now
we have seen Sullivan and his clowns ruin a great club. not that previous chairmen were any better
Watch, it will probably be given to Jack Sullivan, God help us….
Can Sullivan change… No, but he may need to scale down as he grows older.
If true it just highlights yet again the inefficiency of the club’s operations.
With mere weeks to go, the position should already be filled with the correct candidate in post with the agreement of the manager and his team, not necessarily Sullivan, a ‘yes’ man need not apply.
They should already have a handle on outgoings and targets for scenario a) staying in the prem or b) relegation. NOW is when this work should be undertaken, not when the season’s ended. By then we’re playing catch up World Cup or not. This need not be at the expense of the primary aim for this season, but be undertaken in conjunction so our plans are finalised as soon as the final whistle blows on 24 May.
Hello, I seem to be unable to add comments – have I been banned, they are too long, or it is at my end?
Seems okay here Peter mate.
ok, thanks
I agree that we need a DOF but not one that has total control as this would lose us Nuno as it did Moyes. Managers should state which position needs to be filled, the DOF should look for options and the manager should have final say on whether the club signs the player. If Steidten had that arrange ment both he and Moyes might still be at the club