Issa Diop topped the Claret and Hugh West Ham player ratings with an average score of 5.78 out of 10.
His partner in crime Angelo Ogbonna was rated second with a score of 5.72 with goalkeeper Roberto the only other player with a five score managing an average score of 5.39.
Over 3,000 Claret and Hugh readers were in no mood to give out good ratings after yesterday’s disappointing defeat.
Top of the four scores was Seb Haller with an average score of 4.93 followed by Ryan Fredericks on 4.83, Declan Rice was next on 4.66 with Yarmolenko on 4.54 and skipper Mark Noble the last of the four scores on 4.31.
Arthur Masuaku was top of the three scores with an average score of 3.83 followed by Jack Wilshere on 3.46 and Manuel Lanzini on 3.3.
The worst ratings were reserved for Felipe Anderson 3.46, Ablian Ajeti 3.09 and Pablo Fornals 3.08.
These savage ratings are probably the worst ever dished out since the Claret and Hugh player rating system was launched.
The ratings seem about right, although I feel it’s a bit harsh on Ajeti. Why? (I hear you ask) If we are going to give Haller a bye because of the lack of service from midfield etc. then surely Ajetis 16 minutes with 1 less midfielder to supply him, was he really that bad?
Whilst all the players are skilled, I’m not convinced you can play Anderson/Fornals/Lanzini/Wilshire together.