Before I go into any detail about today’s revelations regarding the signing of Maick Diouf, let me start by saying I’ve heard only good things about Max Hahn.
The data analyst scout was brought in under the tenure of Tim Steidten yet remained at the club after the German director of football departed. Hahn made an immediate impact at West Ham and quickly gained the trust of the board, with every transfer being double-checked by him.
As I reported at the time, Dutch midfielder Ezechiel Banzuzi was identified by Hahn, as were Lucas Stassin and John Victor.
However, most would agree that when Malick Diouf was signed, it was widely accepted that the 20-year-old Senegalese international was a Graham Potter and Kyle Macaulay signing. It was reported at the time that both Potter and Macaulay became convinced of Diouf’s pedigree when watching Habib Diarra play for the same national team against England.
Shifting the Narrative
Now, I understand that Potter is no longer flavour of the month, and let’s be fair — he will go down as the worst permanent West Ham manager of all time. However, there was never any pushback at the time that he and his right-hand man Macaulay were pushing hard for the transfers of both Diouf and Mateus Fernandes. Granted, Fernandes was a second choice after missing out on Aston Villa’s Jacob Ramsey, but nonetheless, Potter wanted him.
At no point was this understanding of events challenged by club or transfer sources as the then recruitment team sought to bring in younger, promising players.
Yet now, with Potter gone from the London Stadium, the one piece of credit he might have from a poorly executed job appears to be taken away. We’re now hearing that the impressive Diouf and Fernandes transfers are being credited to Max Hahn. How convenient.
For the record, I don’t for a moment believe ExWHUEmployee is fabricating the story. In fact, I’m quite certain he’s been told the information, and most likely not directly by the club either.
But I find this sudden switch in narrative a little too convenient. It takes credit for good signings away from the recruitment team in place at the time. Are we really supposed to believe that all the decent players signed were down to a single scout reporting directly to David Sullivan and Karren Brady?
Of course, poor old Mads Hermansen has been attributed to Potter and Macaulay’s recruitment — which is rather handy considering he’s looked like a colander so far. No doubt if the Dane suddenly becomes a clean sheet machine, even that story may take on a new spin.
The truth is, it’s enough that Potter has gone. It’s enough that some good players arrived during his time and that we now appear to have a competent coach. But it would be nice if the club allowed him at least a shred of credibility for the things he did get right.


Arsenal 2 – West Ham nuno
Potter: “… he will go down as the worst permanent West Ham manager of all time.”
I’ll take issue with that, as no one could even come close to Avram Grant. IMHO
Well done on a credible balanced and interesting article
Well said Gonzo – as another poster said on here if the player is happy and performing it doesn’t matter who bought him – I remember Slav’s disbelief when Sully tried to claim being the one who “discovered” Lanzini – who Slav had been following before he came to West Ham
Until our management team is united we don’t stand a chance
COYI
Got all the hallmarks of the 🤡 propaganda machine going into overdrive.
😂😂 History is written by the victors Gonzo. I don’t honestly believe Fernandes needed much scouting as most pundits seemed to agree he was a good young player in a struggling team.
Let’s be honest do we really care who’s signing he was .
Yes I do, because if the rumours are true that Macauley could be on his way out of the club and Hahn is staying, I would like to know which of them (the one staying or going) is the one that’s able to pick good players!
Gonzo our club is full of liars and deceit at the top THIS IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF OF OUR CLUB IS BEING RUN
Agree with your sentiment Gonzo. I hope you are wrong simply because it would mean we have the basis of a professional recruitment team, albeit still with Sullivan involved.
Of course, it could be Hahn gave a list of a number of players to P&M based on criteria they detailed, so all can take credit!
That all said, it does feel that Sullivan & Brady are trying to re-write history which says everything about their reputation.
Classic Sullivan and Brady behaviour. Revisionists, they’d do anything now to deflect blame. Desperate stuff from desperate people