web analytics

Don’t expect an Irons cure-all from VAR



Blind Hammer looks at the evidence for VAR aiding West Ham.

The annoyance of West Ham failing to register two perfectly fair goals in their last  two games has increased the eagerness for VAR. West Ham could be 3 points better off today.

The real question is will VAR, over time, help West Ham? For example VAR would have ruled out Hernandez’s embarrassing handball goal against Fulham.

In our home fixture against Manchester United José Mourinho insisted VAR would have ruled out two of West Ham’s goals.

It was fascinating that Mourinho then favoured VAR. It is especially interesting given the benefit that Manchester United have received from referees over years, including our last game against them.  You might expect that Man United, more than most, would lose out under VAR.

Remember the 2016 FA cup quarter final at Old Trafford? Then our Payet-inspired team were denied by two crucial refereeing mistakes. Payet was refused a clear penalty when Rojo slid in from behind. The second error was even worse. Bastian Schweinsteiger held goalkeeper Darren Randolph immobile whilst Martial equalised.

Start supporting Claret and Hugh today Claret & Hugh’s team of creators work with passion and pride to bring you the quality of content that keeps you coming back for more. Support for our creators, however big or small, will help us keep your Hammers content fresh, frequent and loyal to the club. £5 per month £10 per month £20 per month £50 per year

Mark Halsey denied last year on TalkSport that Referees are biased towards bigger clubs. Yet despite Halsey’s protest there is increasing evidence of referee’s having “unconscious bias”.

Graham Poll admitted as much in a Daily Mail interview. In his refereeing days he believes he was objective, but now retired, he can see that bigger teams benefit.

Nowadays, referees endure enormous TV scrutiny if they make a contentious decision against a “big club”. This pressures them to give the benefit of the doubt to the bigger clubs.

All this is supported by 2013 Leicester University research. This tested referees by asking them to adjudicate on key decisions whilst watching match videos.

In one sample they asked referees to make decisions with sound muted. They then played these incidents with the full crowd noise. Not surprisingly the research showed a clear influence from crowd noise.  This favoured the home team. All this proves is that Referees are human, influenced by pressure as much as anybody else.

So the hope is that the VAR safety net should provide referees with more confidence to make decisions against big clubs. Big clubs may just become the biggest losers under VAR.

VAR may help West ham stop suffering poor decisions against bigger clubs. The price is that, of course, we are far less likely to benefit from a Hernandez handball at home. On balance this is a future I welcome.

Click Here for Comments >

About Hugh5outhon1895

Hugh Southon is a lifelong Iron and the founding editor of ClaretandHugh. He is a national newspaper journalist of many years experience and was Bobby Moore's 'ghost' writer during the great man's lifetime. He describes ClaretandHugh as "the Hammers daily newspaper!" Follow on Twitter @hughsouthon

2 comments on “Don’t expect an Irons cure-all from VAR

  1. Indeed VAR is a 2 headed monster, but having seen multiple ‘poor’ officiating decisions over the years, I welcome VAR and the end of unconscious bias…..
    Graham Poll was a major culprit of bias so he can STFU…

  2. If you watch any season of games you will see that decisions do not even out over the season the top six teams have a disproportianate bias of favourable decisions, Leicester would not have won the league if VAR were in place when they benefitted 22 times from dodgy decisons equalled only by Man U and we would have finished in the top four that season possibly even winning the league as our confidence would have been higher than it was in fact we were again that season the hardest done by in terms of bad decisions with if I remember correctly something like 40 decisions worse off than Leicester and Man U. I agree though BH that it is not the silver bullet but overall it should negate sufficiently the advantages the top six richest clubs have harvested for the last 2 to 3 decades.

Comments are closed.