Whispers

Fascinating Fight For Control of West Ham’s Transfer Decisions

|
Image for Fascinating Fight For Control of West Ham’s Transfer Decisions

It was interesting reading Matt’s earlier piece on the prospect of another “Sully Special” occurring in the upcoming transfer window.

For those unfamiliar with the term, allow me to explain. A Sully Special is when chairman David Sullivan personally signs a player who neither the manager nor the recruitment team has approved. Personally, I can’t stand it.

Not necessarily because every hand-picked signing is terrible, but because it shows the owner’s ongoing reluctance to entrust West Ham’s transfer business to the actual experts employed to run it.

Matt made a compelling argument that Crysencio Summerville, Kyle Walker-Peters and Callum Wilson have all been strong acquisitions. But I’ve seen far too many Wellington Paulistas arrive in East London and far too few Diafra Sakhos — who, in my opinion, was Sullivan’s best gamble.

Old Habits vs New Direction

As I wrote earlier this week, I’ve been hugely impressed with the recruitment of Malick Diouf, Mateus Fernandes and Soungoutou Magassa. Their signings suggest a real shift towards a more data-led approach to identifying young, high-ceiling players.

And I refuse to believe the convenient narrative that Kyle Macaulay had “nothing to do” with those deals. From what I hear inside the club, data analyst Max Hahn is extremely capable — but the idea Macaulay wasn’t involved at all seems fanciful.

The problem, as always, is that Sullivan doesn’t truly trust anyone else to sign players for West Ham. Whenever a manager or recruitment head makes a mistake — as with Niclas Füllkrug — it’s noted, remembered and used as ammunition. Yet when the chairman panics and signs Danny Ings for £15m, it somehow never appears on the list of errors. His successes are celebrated; his failures forgotten. For his managers, it’s the exact opposite.

Hermansen Fallout Sets Tone for January

So where does that leave West Ham as January approaches?

Sullivan remains unimpressed with the signing of Mads Hermansen and sees the deal as vindication that he “knows better.” Claret & Hugh were told directly in the summer: “My scouts don’t rate him, but the manager wants him.”

It turns out he may have had a point — and this will only strengthen his belief that he is right and everyone else is wrong.

Sullivan was unimpressed with advice given to sign Hermansen

This creates a fascinating, and slightly worrying, dynamic. Nuno Espírito Santo wants control over transfers — the same issue that caused his clash with Nottingham Forest’s director of football, Edu. Nuno also likes to work closely with agent Jorge Mendes on deals.

With Sullivan’s instincts pulling in one direction and Nuno’s methods in another, West Ham are entering a pivotal period — one that could genuinely define the club’s Premier League future.

Share this article

Hammers Chat my first game was West Ham 10-0 Bury . . . seriously!
We than went and bought Bury's central defender 😬⚒️ Irons

Started Hammers Chat alongside my partner in crime Geo back in 2014 and brough in to Claret & Hugh by my old mate Hughie to produce videos a couple of years later.

Give West Ham opinions on Sky Sports News and even did a bit of moonlighting on BBC Football Focus.

Sometimes feature on BBC Radio 5 Live and once ate a biscuit in Tony Gales shed.

Connoisseur of salted caramel doughnuts and I love a Sloppy Giuseppe pizza although I'm slightly suspicious where the name came from.

When I'm not moaning about West Ham I can be found walking a dog that looks like a sheep and tinkering with pinball machines.

More West Ham moaning is done on a daily basis here 👇👇
https://www.youtube.com/@HammersChatForum

7 comments

  • West Ham Fan No 32 says:

    On Hermansen was similar, not sure why a relegated keeper was seen as a good option but happy to trust Potter, which turned out a bad choice, Victor seemed risky but at least cheap and with a good record of clean sheets, he hasn’t made it at Forest though so maybe another bullet dodged ?

    Areola has played better but still punches balls he could catch and parries into the centre of the box which often goes to an opposing attacker from which they score.

    I think we should get another keeper or give Herrick a shot, as for strikers Sully specials have been generally woeful and expensive.

  • Bryz says:

    Have we put in a low unrealistic bid for Mo Salah yet?

  • mark wiggins says:

    Just for once I would like to see Nuno trusted and back him with the players he wants . He’s made improvements with the squad . We look more organised we will win games . But he needs backing

  • Kenny Irons says:

    And Sullivan wonders why the fans want him out ?!
    He is Hackney Marshes and this is the Premier League, where we won’t be for much longer if this senile interfering clown keeps poking his nose in !!

  • T-Bone says:

    Yes, there’s been some shockers, but a few gems do spring to mind.

    I agree Sakho was good, even if it ended badly.

    But I’m pretty sure Lanzini was a Sully Special. I’d have him above Sakho!

  • ExPatHammer says:

    Out of curiosity, what is the ratio of “Sully Special” success to failure transfer ratio versus recruitment team success to failure transfer ratio?

    Of course success versus flop is subjective…

  • REGINALD OLIVER says:

    Sullivans right hand does not know what his left hand is doing cannot be trusted

Comments are closed.