web analytics

Full Kretinsky Hammers takeover not on the cards

CandH Exclusive by Hughie Southon

Any chance of a full Daniel Kretinsky West Ham takeover next year is now looking very unlikely.

There has been a widespread belief that one we pass April of next year when the so called embarrassment clause with the London Stadium owners no longer exists, David Sullivan and David Gold will sell up their shareholding allowing the Czech investor to take over.

Gold currently hold a 27 per cent shareholding and Kretinsky obviously needs to have over 50 per cent to become the main man.

But our understanding is that GSB intend to remain on the board and although David Gold may be prepared to sell some of his shares at some stage he certainly won’t be letting them all pass into Kretinsky’s hands.

Sullivan is hugely unlikely to sell any of his which  also confirm  that he has no plans to take control of his former club Birmingham City.

It’s far more likely that things will remain very close to the way they are now with Sullivan continuing as the largest but NOT controlling shareholder.

Click Here for Comments >

About Hugh5outhon1895

Hugh Southon is a lifelong Iron and the founding editor of ClaretandHugh. He is a national newspaper journalist of many years experience and was Bobby Moore's 'ghost' writer during the great man's lifetime. He describes ClaretandHugh as "the Hammers daily newspaper!" Follow on Twitter @hughsouthon

3 comments on “Full Kretinsky Hammers takeover not on the cards

  1. I’m no football business expert, but I anticipate a number of interested parties to be sniffing around WHUFC over the next couple of years ….. IF the American NFL team Denver Broncos just sold for USD 4.25Billion. then EPL clubs with the new football/TV deal have to be an interesting investment??

  2. It will be interesting to see how or if this impacts investment into the team. If Kretinsky is not going to be the majority shareholder in the next 2-3 years what appetite will he have to invest further?
    On a separate but connected point, I was of the understanding that there was a fixed date and price for Kretinsky to buy a majority holding. Presumably this is not the case?

Comments are closed.