West Ham is eighth in a Premier League table of net spend over the past five seasons.
Manchester City led the way with a net spend of £505m or £101m per season, Manchester United are second with a net spend of £379m or £76m per season.
Everton is third with a net spend of £275m averaging out at £55m per season.
Arsenal is next with a net spend of £249m working out nearly £50m per season.
Newly promoted Aston Villa have still spent £198m net over the last five years putting them on an average of nearly £40m per season.
Brighton have spent over £197m in net spend making their per season average £39.5m
Wolves also outspend the Hammers with nearly £185m in net spend averaging out to £37m.
West Ham have spent £308m net over the past five seasons meaning their average is just over £31m per season.
The table shows net spend is everything though with Chelsea (£26m per season) Leceister City (£22.5m per season) Spurs (£19m per season) and current league leaders Liverpool (£18.5m) all way below the Hammers net spend.
12th and now 8th in spending table.
Big losses, qualified to relegation
Yeah, we are closing in on transfer window.
Excuses, excuses and more excuses.
Sell, sell and sell is my advice
Pathetic
There are at least 4 teams above us in that table who can identify a decent player to buy. We are pants.
So we will have nothing to spend in January , no change there. Wonder where the money goes . Having said that I hope MP & the squad have sorted things in the break & are all in it together with the same goal . Let’s hope the untd is back at West Ham. COYI ⚒
Normal apologist for premierships worst board incompetence runs through them like a stick of rock they have been in football 30 years and achieved nothing why not take the money and sell .At least they have stabilised us into a a bottom half premiership playing in a rented athletics stadium