Hart loan speculation emerges AGAIN!

joe-hart-manchester-city-hull-premier-league_3001982New reports that the Hammers are ready to launch a loan deal arrangement for Joe Hart are wide of the mark.

The report claims that with Manchester City wanting the England keeper off the books, the Hammers are ready to launch a loan deal this term and pay the stopper’s £100k wages with a view to signing him permanently next season.

The Hart story has been around for some time but Liverpool are at the head of the queue with the Hammers far more focused on a striker/s.

And were they to shell out nearly £5 million on wages for the stopper plus another £5 million in loan fees that would damage their main priority this summer.

Hart, anyway, will await events at Manchester United – where David De Gea’s future is uncertain – and Liverpool but continues to insist he has two years left on his deal at the Etihad and won’t be rocking any boats.

West Ham sources have regularly told Claretandhugh that a goalkeeper is not on their priority list at this point


About Hugh5outhon1895

Hugh Southon is a lifelong Iron and the founding editor of ClaretandHugh. He is a national newspaper journalist of many years experience and was Bobby Moore's 'ghost' writer during the great man's lifetime. He describes ClaretandHugh as "the Hammers daily newspaper!" Follow on Twitter @hughsouthon

6 comments on “Hart loan speculation emerges AGAIN!

  1. Joe Hart has never inspired confidence as far as I’m concerned and he is no better than Adrian imho …im sure there are stats somewhere to back that up. Highly overrated

  2. Don’t want him ; especially after his recent performances . Overrated and over paid .
    I have confidence in Adrian and , in my opinion he better than Hart anyway , or at least just as good . We had a pretty rough season last term and I find it very difficult to blame our Keepers and see no reason to change them . We need Goal Scorers not keepers . Let City get Thier 100k per week from somewhere else .

  3. His form has certainly dipped, having been a big fan previously I thought he should have done better with both the free kicks yesterday but I would back us signing him as he is much better than Randolph and he would draw positive attention to the club.

    • Sorry , West Ham 32 , but what is the point of signing a keeper who’s formed has dropped and City doesn’t want . He almost cost us 3 World Cup points . He can’t even attract the Ball .
      None of it makes any sense to me .

      • Form is temporary as they say and he has enough history of playing well to suggest that his will return, I would rather have him than Randolph that was the point Kevin even an out of form Hart is better than an in form Randy but I would say that only if we buy him and not on loan and if it was a choice between Hart and Pickford I would take Pickford but all of this is speculation so who cares 😎

  4. What ever happens we need to get rid of Randy, Pickford would be my pick with Adrian 2nd

Comments are closed.