4 Comments

Irons v Cherries – Hammers fans give their player ratings

ClaretandHugh followers have produced their own ratings on the team’s performances yesterday against Bournemouth.

It’s the second week of the ratings which take everybody’s marks and produces a mean average from top tot to bottom.

Over 500 of you took part for the match against Bournemouth and for the second week on the trot goalkeeper Lukasz Fabianski was voted man of the match.

The full ratings from top to bottom were:

O Fabianski 6.81

O Arnautovic 6.72

O Yarmolenko 5.38

O Chicharito 5.52

O Noble   4.85

O Wilshere 4.63

O Snodgrass 4.62

O Balbuena 4.62

O Zabaleta 4.59

O Perez 4.57

O Ogbonna 4.38

O Masuaku 3.85

O Anderson 3.54

ClaretandHugh will be giving all followers the opportunity of marking the players in every game this season so stay in touch with us to ensure you get the fans ratings!

 

 

About Hugh5outhon1895

Hugh Southon is a lifelong Iron and the founding editor of ClaretandHugh. He is a national newspaper journalist of many years experience and was Bobby Moore's 'ghost' writer during the great man's lifetime. He describes ClaretandHugh as "the Hammers daily newspaper!" Follow on Twitter @hughsouthon

4 comments on “Irons v Cherries – Hammers fans give their player ratings

  1. Thanks for the ratings. Like Hugh in his earlier piece I thought that Zaba played quite well and was actually one of our greatest threats going forward

    Ogbonna messed up giving away the free kick that lead to the second goal – perhaps that is one of the hazards of always trying to play out from the back – Ginge would have put the ball into row Z – and I am sure that’s what Moyes and BFS would have told the players (put it into row Z if in doubt)

  2. no wilshere? no snodgrass?
    anderson being at the bottom is an utter joke. he didn’t have the greatest game but he set up the goal with a sublime pass. he’s learning to play this league, and some are only prepared to give him 180 minutes?! ridiculous
    our team needs to dump the likes of noble (sanchez), snodgrass (yarmolenko), ogbonna (diop), masuaku (cresswell) as quickly as possible.

  3. Anderson at the bottom is a joke. It was Anderson helped create the goal. It was Balbuenas half hearted lunge of a tackle that led to their first goal. But Balbuena scores higher in the player ratings than Anderson. Why? Because some people only see what they want to see and they can’t see Beyond a high price tag. They expect Anderson to perform miracles right off the bat. It was the same with arnoutavic last year. The best player on the pitch was Wilshere but he wasn’t even playing according to this poll? Or Snodgrass? Who had a good game by the way until late on when he ran out of steam.

  4. Anderson rightly bottom. It has nothing to do with price tag and everything to do with effort.
    You don’t see Man City or Liverpool players standing still, double teapot posed as players run around them.
    He looked promising on the ball although for a winger with pace I’d be expecting him to at least try and beat a man but the total lack of effort, not reading the game and sitting on his heals cannot be tolerated. Bournemouth carved through out left hand side like the Germans marching through Poland.
    Arthur Masuaku in a back 4 is a disaster. If he plays then it has to be in a back 5. To be honest, he is probably better at taking on players and getting a ball on than Anderson and should be viewed as a winger. If Anderson puts in a shift then I have no doubt he is a better player than Arthur, but only if he works hard. 90 minutes once a week is not too much to expect. Pull your finger out lads!!!!!!!
    COYI

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *