Sam’s “safe hands” not enough for this great club

Snidey AllardyceTwitter really isn’t the best place to hold a discussion!

One hundred and forty character soundbites are really not the stuff of sound argument and balanced debate.

Yet there’s one point of view that is regularly put forward on there as a central argument for keeping Sam Allardyce in place as West Ham manager.

It goes like this: “Sam is a safe pair of hands against relegation and has done what the club asked him to do.”

Sorry but I have real problems with that at two levels:

1/ There were 16 other Premier League managers who achieved safety without resorting to the sort of football seen from West Ham last season;

and perhaps more importantly, if our only ambition is to avoid relegation  I would suggest that West Ham has become a club with absolutely no ambition.

Outside of the big boys, among those who managed to remain in the top League were Steve Bruce, Paul Lambert, Gus Poyet, Tony Pulis and Alan Pardew.

None are big name managers but guys who can at least introduce a degree of flexibility to their sides.

Ok, Allardyce is a safe pair of  hands but that’s not enough for me, nor should it be for this great club of ours.

My problem has always been with the brand of football Allardyce supplies and the examples of those who have managed to stay afloat, listed above, demonstrates it doesn’t have to be this way.

I believe from regular conversation held with people inside Upton Park that the club does have big ambitions.

But too often I have heard the worried  murmur: “But we must survive – we really must.” It flaws our thinking and it prevents  a move towards a progressive style and it’s that thinking which needs to be rooted out.

We now stand one week away from one of the most critical decisions this club has had to make in recent years.

My view has been constant. Sam’s ways have never been my ways and we really need to bring back the style.

There are managers out there who can create balance between flair and solidarity – manager of the year Pulis proved that, Gus Poyet, did a remarkable job at Sunderland and even Swansea City’s unsung Garry Monk, taking over from Michael Laudrup, managed it.

I don’t remember hearing those clubs talking regularly and monotonously about  the need to avoid relegation as the main aim however much much it was on their minds so why West Ham? That kind of talk sends out all the wrong signals!

As the May 23 crunch meeting approaches I would say this to the board:  “Look forward – not back…stop looking over your shoulder – move forward  – survival mentalities are for the anxious and unambitious.

West Ham needs a bold new vision with a top winning manager. That may cost a few quid but avoiding relegation can  no longer be the sole objective for this club we love so much!


About Hugh5outhon1895

Hugh Southon is a lifelong Iron and the founding editor of ClaretandHugh. He is a national newspaper journalist of many years experience and was Bobby Moore's 'ghost' writer during the great man's lifetime. He describes ClaretandHugh as "the Hammers daily newspaper!" Follow on Twitter @hughsouthon

4 comments on “Sam’s “safe hands” not enough for this great club

  1. The fact is and let’s be realistic about this, west ham has been a Yoyo club for many years. What we need more than anything in my opinion is a period of stability. I have no doubt once we move into olympic stadium and with premier league football being the global brand that it is, we will become a more attractive proposition to both players and managers alike. Not saying we should stand still for the next two years but we need firm foundations to build on.

    • We were unlucky with the injuries to key players this year. That’s a fact that can’t be disputed and considering the injuries we were probably lucky just to have survived relegation yet alone finish thirteenth. Next year will be different with the addition of some quality players to the squad.

  2. so we needed to spend another 8 million to just about avoid relegation like sunderland did?

  3. We should only sack him if we have someone decent to replace him, malky McKay is waiting in the wings according to the press, to do what, I’d rather keep fat boy than have him

Comments are closed.