West Ham fan and Guardian columnist Jacob Steinberg has delivered a damning verdict on Hammers chairman David Sullivan in his latest newspaper column.
With West Ham teetering on the brink of relegation, Steinberg looked back at the promises made by Sullivan and Karren Brady during the move to the London Stadium — the talk of a “world-class team in a world-class stadium” — and compared it to what has actually been delivered.
And one of the biggest indictments of Sullivan’s reign is the fact that so many clubs once viewed as significantly smaller than West Ham have now overtaken us despite operating with smaller crowds and tighter budgets.
Smaller Clubs Leave West Ham Behind
None of this will come as any surprise to West Ham fans.
But sometimes seeing it written down in black and white makes it feel even worse.
As the old saying goes, people rarely notice gradual change while it’s happening. And viewed through a modern Premier League lens, it’s now easy to think of Brighton, Bournemouth and Brentford as established, well-run top-flight clubs.
But it wasn’t always like that, in fact the transition has happened during Sullivans stint.
Bournemouth, Brighton And Brentford Context Matters
As someone who moved from East London down to Boscombe at the age of 13, I know exactly where Bournemouth have come from.
A lot of my mates supported the Cherries and, believe it or not, I can even remember Harry Redknapp managing Ian Bishop in black and red. Bournemouth were a small club.
Brighton, until relatively recently, were playing in a converted athletics and hockey stadium, while Brentford traditionally operated as the fourth-biggest club in west London, often overshadowed by Queens Park Rangers.
Which is why Steinberg’s comments hit home.
Steinberg Nails West Ham’s Biggest Problem
“West Ham should feel ashamed when they gaze up the table and see Brentford, Bournemouth and Brighton challenging for Champions League qualification.
“Those are clubs with proper structures and clear identities, allowing them to punch above their weight.
“What they lack in size is made up for in expertise.
“They play in smaller grounds than West Ham, whose stadium holds 62,500, but they are more organised, more intelligent and more adept at squad-building.”
The Biggest Issue? Nobody Thinks They’ve Failed
The only thing Steinberg may have got wrong is the idea that Sullivan should feel ashamed.
I honestly don’t think he does.
In fact, I suspect West Ham’s majority shareholder still views his time at the club as a success — much in the same way Brady seemed to while practically patting herself on the back during her exit.
And that, for me, is one of the biggest reasons West Ham struggle to move forward.
Because the first step towards improvement is admitting mistakes have been made and recognising what has gone wrong.
And under the current ownership, that moment never really seems to come.
Sullivan is always making money and the clubs secondary to him on the football side..he plays football manager in real life with some of the players he has just dumped on a manager regardless of what they think although i will admit his purchase of Summerville will be profitable for the club and help pay of some of the debt the club owes but lets face facts our ground is not ours the training facilities are comparable to a league one side and that is where we are heading…As for the possibility of a takeover by Rich Americans please no look at Chelski and the mess they are in…Americans sport is run different so do not make a mess by letting them in.
Overthinking Gonzo. Relax a lot more and try not to search for the answer to everything.
It’s 42 by the way.
Does Sullivan pay you for your support Taffy, or do you pay him for the pleasure?
Not a fan of Sullivan, but I guess he will say 5 European campaigns in 10 years at the stadium and one European trophy?
You could finish that sentence with ‘and yet we are still in an absolute mess’