web analytics

WHUISA publish full minutes of David Sullivan meeting

West Ham Co-Chairman David Sullivan told representatives of West Ham United Independent Supporters’ Association (WHUISA) and Football Supporters’ Federation (FSF) that the board will consider a supporter or former player on the board in the future to give some representation to the fans.

He also said he would help lobby to get a supporter on the Newham Safety Adgroups group as fans have unique insights to the problems faced at the London Stadium.  The Co-Chairman also promised the group he will no longer give interviews to the press going forward.

Sullivan revealed he is massively disappointed with what has happened this season at West Ham. He starts each season with the ambition to win the league, hopes to have a miracle season like Leicester but always sets the realistic ambition to be finishing in the top 8 and nudging the top 4. However, he stated that he has given himself 5-6 years to turn it around and if not will then step aside.

The full minutes totalling nine pages can be read at https://whuisa.org/news/2018/3/21/meeting-between-whuisa-david-sullivan

Click Here for Comments >

About Sean Whetstone

I am Season Ticket Holder in West stand lower at the London Stadium and before that, I used to stand in the Sir Trevor Brooking Lower Row R seat 159 in the Boleyn Ground and in the Eighties I stood on the terraces of the old South Bank. I am a presenter on the West Ham Podcast called MooreThanJustaPodcast.co.uk. A Blogger on WestHamTillIdie.com a member of the West Ham Supporters Advisory Board (SAB), Founder of a Youtube channel called Mr West Ham Football at http://www.youtube.com/MrWestHamFootball, I am also the associate editor here at Claret and Hugh. Life Long singer of bubbles! Come on you Irons! Follow me at @Westhamfootball on twitter

2 comments on “WHUISA publish full minutes of David Sullivan meeting

  1. He’ll leave in 5-6 years if he doesn’t get it right?

    Isn’t this also the timescale when they can sell the club and keep all the proceeds?

    Handy coincidence that.

  2. What an absolute waste of time. Are we back in 1930s Berlin with that level of censorship?

    Why was none of the questions that really matter to supporters not allowed to be asked?

    Why was the question regarding the loans not dealt with a proper answer?

    Why was there no questions about the chronic lack of investment?

Comments are closed.