How we rated the Irons v Silkeborg

Johnson:6 With the exception of Areola Johnson probably saw less of the game than anyone else. In the most part he wasn’t really needed which says much about the chasm in performance between the two sides. When he was eventually tested in the 55th min he failed to switch back on and West Ham were almost punished. Good cross-field passing on occasion.

Ogbonna:6 Playing wider than usual largely due to having nobody to mark and West Ham having the majority of possession.

Aguerd:7 For many the first chance to see our £30m defender. Played at the heart of the defence and displayed a good passing range and organisational skills.

Coufal:7 Overlapped and put in crosses when needed but much of The Irons attacking play was through the middle. Good cross for Benrahma which should have resulted in a goal. Looked fit and sharp.

Emerson:6 Looked a bit rusty with a few overhit passes. rarely required to do any defending. Unlucky not to win a freekick but really needs to play to the whistle more. Grew into the game.

Coventry:6 Very comfortable in possession. More than good enough for this level of football. Made a late run to the edge of the box which was picked out by Benrahma but the resulting shot went narrowly wide.

Lanzini:7 The Argentinian was in metronomic cruise control spending much of the game dropping deep to link play. Accurately slotted home the Hammers opener from the penalty spot.

Fornals:7 Good ball for Antonio set up West Ham’s first serious attempt on goal. Far more creative when not playing wide. Should have scored early in the second half.

Benrahma:8 The benefits of back to back starts were evident in his immediate sharpness. A creative hub for much of West Ham’s attacking play. Could have scored 4 on another day.

Antonio:6 Remained vertical during the build up play and was far more effective as a result. Did well to win a penalty when a goal kick looked more likely.