Answering a question from Andrew Boff at the London Assembly Plenary about the possibility of buying out West Ham from the ‘onerous contract’ Goldstone said: “That is not one of the things we are looking at because we have a 99 year agreement and the potential benefit of having Premier League football in the area is a big part of the benefits”
Pushed by Member Boff on the estimate of buying West Ham out Goldstone said “Such an analysis of the direct financial cost to buy out a Premier League club who have committed for 99 years and the economic value that the stadium contributes to the wider regeneration could be in the billions! I don’t think that is an amount that the London Assembly would consider losing”
Boff also questioned Goldstone whether there was a fresh case for a complaint to the European Commission for state aid if the £40m from Newham was effectively a gift. Goldstone shook his head suggesting he didn’t think so but said that he couldn’t answer investment decisions on behalf of Newham council.
Claret and Hugh note: Considering West Ham are only tenants of the London Stadium from the outside it is difficult to understand on what basis a fresh claim of state aid could be made against the Hammers.