West Ham twice had goals ruled out due to VAR intervention, both for handball violations. While adhering to the letter of the law, the lengthy review times (over five minutes each) significantly dampened the celebratory atmosphere.
Some experts suggest that referees and VAR officials might be taking an excessively cautious approach due to a fear of making mistakes under the current leadership at PGMOL.
There’s a growing consensus that VAR needs a clear balance between accuracy and maintaining the flow of the game. Perhaps tighter time constraints for reviews could be implemented, or perhaps a threshold for the significance of the potential error could be established. A faster, more decisive approach could minimise disruption without compromising the technology’s core purpose.
While VAR aims to eliminate human error, some argue that it removes an element of drama and emotional investment from the game. Controversial refereeing decisions, while frustrating, have always been part of football’s history. Removing this entirely might take away from the raw emotion and passion that define the sport.
The West Ham match serves as a wake-up call for the authorities responsible for VAR implementation. Refining the system to minimize disruption while upholding its core function is crucial. Striking a balance between accuracy and entertainment is essential if VAR is to truly become a positive force in football.