Whispers

Sullivan shareholding increase makes sense in light of worrying new report | West Ham News

Image for Sullivan shareholding increase makes sense in light of worrying new report | West Ham News

Along with just about every West Ham United supporter I was hoping for the fall out from the allegations aired by the BBC to lead to the demise of David Sullivan as a West Ham shareholder as well as the end of his direct influence as co- Chairman.

Further revelations by West Ham that Sullivan had been barred from contact with the women’s and juniors teams through ‘safeguarding concerns’ only increased the bad smell in the boardroom and the desire for a new era to begin, clean and ‘unsullied’ by allegations of past activities.

So the surprise was genuine when Sullivan increased his shareholding, ’rounding up’ from 38.1 to 40% in the Vanessa Gold shares’ pre-emption allocation. Whilst it is clear the ‘ex Chairman’ is just that and has no ‘power’ as an executive, his shadow still hangs over the club and seeing him in the directors box still rankles with just about every attendee at the London Stadium.

David Sullivan: Still in the Director’s box at London Stadium

Trouble is, he has several hundred million pounds tied up in the club and based on a new report today from footballleagueworld.co.uk,  there is no end in sight for the Sullivan era. If anything, the future is less rosy, but the logic behind increasing his shareholding up to 40% seems evident when looking at their report:

“David Sullivan is planning for his sons to take over at West Ham..

Sullivan’s plans for West Ham extend well beyond simply getting the club back into the Premier League. The controversial major shareholder is reportedly preparing to hand his stake in the Hammers down to his sons, Jack and David junior, in time.

Rather than walking away from the club after more than 16 years of ownership, Sullivan is said to be planning a succession which would see his football-mad children eventually inherit his position

The report quotes well respected journalist Alan Nixon as the source.

“Nixon reports that Sullivan appears to have been grooming his sons for a future role. Both have previously been involved with West Ham, meaning this is not necessarily a completely new idea.”

Which is enough to put most West Ham United fans off their cornflakes this morning, however rosy the league table is looking.

David Sullivan denies all of the allegations made against him.

Share this article

From the old Bobby Moore Upper to the Billy Bonds' stand these days - sometimes- have to admit I have not renewed my season ticket... I've been watching since '03 and a supporter since about 1970..
Favourite player - Dean Ashton: Still watch YouTube repeats of the Cup Final of 2006 hoping in vain that Shaka Hislop grows six inches and stops Steven Gerrard's injury time equaliser. Can tell I'm getting old knowing I saw both Mark Noble's debut and his last game at West Ham.
Pulling on a Claret and Blue replica shirt still makes me feel the same butterflies as when I was seven years old. Magic.

3 comments

  • Bring Back Budgie Byrne says:

    Surely if this were true he would have increased his stake to 49.99%???

  • Dean says:

    Hi Martin, I see the assertion that he has no power and I find it an impossible position to believe. As you say he has hundreds of millions invested and with that comes rights and power, it is certainly true that he is no longer on the board but his sons are on the board and they plainly have an input in everything that happens, even if they don’t have executive powers. If the shares are handed down to his sons they would almost certainly want to be admitted as full board members with full voting rights and executive powers which means the Sullivan family would once again be at the heart of decision making at our club. Cheers and I really hope I’m totally wrong mate

  • DM 60 + years a says:

    “Grooming his sons “! This isn’t news, anyone with half a brain new that, no surprises here.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *