Whispers

Křetínský Could Have His Eyes On West Ham’s Biggest Prize

Image for Křetínský Could Have His Eyes On West Ham’s Biggest Prize

The long-running debate over the future of the London Stadium has taken a significant step forward after London Mayor Sadiq Khan recently indicated he would consider a credible offer from West Ham United to buy the venue, providing it represents value for taxpayers and protects the venue’s wider sporting and community benefits.
The question is no longer whether a sale is possible. It is what a deal would look like, what it would cost West Ham, and how dramatically the stadium could change under private ownership.

Why A Sale Is Suddenly Being Discussed

The London Stadium remains publicly owned through organisations ultimately linked to the Greater London Authority, while West Ham operate as tenants under a 99-year lease signed in 2013.
The arrangement has become increasingly controversial because the stadium reportedly loses around £19 million per year, with taxpayers effectively underwriting the venue’s operating deficit.

Assembly Member Bassam Mahfouz recently urged the Mayor to consider selling the stadium to West Ham, describing the current arrangement as “disastrous” for taxpayers.

Khan’s response stopped short of actively pursuing a sale, but he made it clear that any serious proposal would be considered.
However, determining the value of London Stadium is far from straightforward, yet I am sure a certain Czech businessman has a figure in mind!

Owning The Stadium Would Bring Enormous Benefits But Also Major Responsibilities

Under the current arrangement, West Ham do not cover several significant operating costs, including stewarding, policing and pitch maintenance. If ownership transferred, West Ham would inherit responsibility for the total running costs. However, ownership would also unlock substantial new revenue streams.

The biggest complaint from supporters since the move from Upton Park has been the distance between fans and the pitch. The stadium was designed for athletics first and football second. Feedback has been focussed on moving seats closer to the pitch, creating a better atmosphere, improve site lines and in turn could even provide the opportunity to further increase capacity closer to 70,000.

There are however still major obstacles. Khan has made it clear that any proposal would need to ensure taxpayer value is protected, and athletics can continue (whether this could be moved to another site is a possible solution).

With taxpayer losses continuing to attract scrutiny and City Hall now appearing open to discussions, the idea of West Ham owning the London Stadium has moved from fantasy to a realistic possibility.
With an announcement on West Ham’s new share ownership structure expected imminently, it will be interesting to see whether talks begin between the two parties.

Share this article

I have been a season ticket holder since the late eighties, so experienced the highs and lows of being a West Ham supporter. I previously wrote for OLAS and have contributed to a number of football publications in the past.

9 comments

  • Phillip says:

    It pains me to even consider saying it out loud, but this could be an opportunity to follow the route that Tottenham originally proposed – pay for the refurbishment of the track and field stadium at Crystal Palace to make that into a world class venue, in the manner of the Alexander Stadium in Birmingham. It could be done with a standard capacity, that could then be expandable for big events (as was the case for the Commonwealth Games and the European Championships). Given that the refurbishment has already been announced, the club could be an investor in it as opposed to paying for the whole thing. That would safeguard the track and field legacy, and leave the club free to do what needs to be done to turn the Olympic Stadium into a genuine venue for football. Everyone’s a winner.

  • Steveo says:

    I hate the the stadium as it is. Fortunately I watch from a corporate area where fans don’t insist on standing up through games. Travelling in from Essex on trains takes 50mins the return home takes 2hrs due to the walk from the ground to Stratford station.
    Give me the Boleyn back any day. The pubs and clubs were buzzing with great atmosphere. Stratford is no where near those days

    • Ironhammer says:

      Walk to Hackney wick station, come back to Stratford 20 mins if the train comes quickly…. Btw the old ground was as awful as this one and you can’t survive on 35k crowds

      • Dagenham Dave says:

        We could have redeveloped the Chicken Run to give us a capacity of 52000 but those clowns GSB lied to us about building above the height of the flats behind The bus garage is now closed and the new development is much bigger than the flats in Priory Those three destroyed our club for personal greed, never forget that

    • Bob says:

      You liked the vibrancy of the pubs and clubs of Upton Park but now choose to sit in a sterile corporate area as nobody stands up in front of you ?
      My walk back to the station takes about an extra 5-15 minutes more than it does from the station to the stadium on the way in. Why does your journey home take you an extra hour and 10 minutes ???
      You do realise that we all know what happens and know how long it takes ?? For the record you could also spend up to half an hour queuing along Queen street to get in to Upton Park station after the match. So the journey back to the station took much longer than on arrival there too and that was sometimes with just 25,000 in attendance.

  • Morty says:

    I seem to remember that the new stadium was initially sold to us fans as a close to the pitch football stadium that could be wheeled out (stand by stand) to reveal a running track and allow athletics fans to watch their sport in a football stadium (much like the Stad de France in Paris).

    Of course in reality switching from football to athletics is a much more complicated process and we have been left with football fans watching football in an athletics stadium. I wonder if the “stadium on wheels” idea could be resurrected in a joint financial partnership between West Ham and local government? The long term goal being to remove the government losses in the stadium and allowing athletics to continue at the venue, with West Ham buying the ground.

  • Graham watts says:

    First base is to get ownership as originally bid for after Olympics. Levy and Barry Hearn with bungler Boris scuppered that!
    We can then look at best means of improving stadium. Its upper tier both ends needs sorting. Billy Bonds stand is fine. The brilliant transport links makes the location a winner and its easy to improve catering.

    • Wiggy says:

      Sorry but transport links aren’t ok & Stratford station isn’t fit for purpose, shocking. I usually only have 2 trains an hour on the Liverpool St line with overcrowded tunnels, corridors and trains. Westfield are happy to take our money before a game but cut off exit routes afterwards. Agree on the catering. Brewdog is shocking and the prices awful

      • Bob says:

        The train service isn’t the clubs fault. After getting back to Barking from upton park on the tube there was then only 2 trains an hour on the c2c out to Southend way. Even then not every train then stopped at every station as it either went through upminster or dagenham then sometimes stopped at grays or went through to Southend. These aren’t new stadium issues, the trains have always been rubbish and even more erratic on weekends. Stop blaming the club and stadium as is convenient to do so.

Comments are closed.