Whispers

Millwall 2 – 2 West Ham United | Serious consequences may lie ahead for two West Ham players

Image for Millwall 2 – 2 West Ham United | Serious consequences may lie ahead for two West Ham players

A very odd moment arose during West Ham’s battle with Millwall this afternoon, midway through the second half when Millwall’s goal keeper appeared to hold onto the ball for about twelve seconds: West Ham thought they’d been awarded a corner as a result, with the ball ending up in Millwall’s net only for the “goal” to be chalked off.

This was a head scratcher to fans and TV viewers as well who couldn’t understand why a drop ball resulted, in favour of Millwall’s keeper Filip Marschall.

It turned out- as has already found its way into the headlines, (independent.co.uk) that there had been some alleged unpleasantness off the ball that the TV director – and many fans in the ground – missed:

“Millwall goalkeeper Filip Marschall alleged that West Ham forward Taty Castellanos spat at him during the meeting of the London rivals at The Den on Saturday.

The incident came during the second half of the derby and as goalkeeper Marschall delayed releasing the ball from his hands while his side were leading 2-0.”

Many fans had voiced their concerns over Taty’s temperament after the fiery Argentinian’s string of yellows suggested he’s not one to keep a lid on it when the stakes are high.

Referee Paul Tierney took no action at the time

That incident will surely go to the FA who, if he’s found guilty, can impose a six game ban should the video evidence be compelling after match referee Paul ‘I didn’t see anything today‘ Tierney sends in his match report. If it’s true, then frankly he deserves whatever punishment is heading his way.

Hammers fans may remember the same punishment being meted out to Arthur Masuaku in 2018.

Millwall v West Ham United at The Den in the Championship

Kante went from hero to villain in 15 minutes at The Den

In addition, Mohamadou Kanté will receive a suspension for his second half straight red card although if memory serves me right this will be ‘just’ a one or two game ban: All in all the Hammers could pay a pretty heavy price for their hard-earned point at The Den this afternoon.

Share this article

From the old Bobby Moore Upper to the Billy Bonds' stand these days - sometimes- have to admit I have not renewed my season ticket... I've been watching since '03 and a supporter since about 1970..
Favourite player - Dean Ashton: Still watch YouTube repeats of the Cup Final of 2006 hoping in vain that Shaka Hislop grows six inches and stops Steven Gerrard's injury time equaliser. Can tell I'm getting old knowing I saw both Mark Noble's debut and his last game at West Ham.
Pulling on a Claret and Blue replica shirt still makes me feel the same butterflies as when I was seven years old. Magic.

15 comments

  • Harry says:

    Taty is dripping with sweat and he stands over the goalkeeper?

  • H says:

    He didn’t spit I saw it. Simply running towards the goalkeeper who’s on the ground and he comes to a sudden stop. Taty is dripping with sweat. When he stops suddenly no doubt the goalkeeper felt some of Tate’s sweat on him and thought he’d spat.

  • Sue says:

    I did not see anything on the replays shown that Taty did spit
    I would be very disappointed in him if evidence is found that he did.
    It is not acceptable to spit at anyone.
    He would have let himself down and more to the point his team mates and the fans
    It will be interesting to see if it was just gamesman ship from the GK
    If it is found then he should be banned

  • Sue says:

    I did not see anything on the replays shown that Taty did spit
    I would be very disappointed in him if evidence is found that he did.
    It is not acceptable to spit at anyone.
    He would have let himself down and more to the point his team mates and the fans
    It will be interesting to see if it was just gamesman ship from the GK
    If it is found then he should be banned

  • M.C. Hammer says:

    Totally agree with some of the comments. The replays showed nothing, absolutely no evidence of Taty spitting whatsoever and it looked very much like gamesmanship from the keeper, trying to affect the game that had completely flipped. As for Kanye, well that perfectly summed him up, infuriatingly clumsy or brilliant.

  • Zahama says:

    As far as Kante is concerned he did what he had to by pulling the player back – so no dangerous play

    A one game ban will not be bad

    Kante has done well this season and long may it continue

  • Gavin Carder says:

    If there is no evidence found and he is not guilty then what happens to the person accusing does he get a six week ban.Dont hang him out until we see the evidence,if he did then he deserves what he gets if there isn’t then there should be serious implications the other way

  • E says:

    Absolutely nothing to be seen here on that so called spitting incident,if anything there keeper should be getting a ban for being an absolute cheat…
    Regarding Kante thats the best red card you’ll see all season,the lad made a mistake but his actions got us a hard earned point in a game where we weren’t at the races for a long time,so fair play to him,plus the fact he scored a cracking goal as well…

  • pjgaler says:

    I honestly cannot see how he spat as he was too far away from Marschall and (from what I saw) his head was facing downwards too. However, if he did spit then he deserves all he gets and I am a Hammers fan through and through.

  • Ray says:

    If it turns out to be an attempt to get Taty in trouble or change the ref’s decision, what happens to the ‘keeper?

  • John Ayris says:

    The ban for denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity is one game, Kante will miss the next game.

  • John Ayris says:

    I’ve seen the video of it and I couldn’t see anything that looked like spitting, I’d be surprised if it was upheld.

  • Mick says:

    Yet to see any evidence of tatty spitting sky was all over this with close ups and found nothing
    What happen to innocent till proven guilty?

    • Kingston Hammer says:

      Mick is spot on …

      Innocent until proven guilty …

      Didn’t see any evidence of spitting..

      You seem very very quick to Always headline the worst case ..

      Steve B

      ..

Comments are closed.