The loan of Victor Moses from Chelsea could approach £6m this season.
Our senior West Ham source told ClaretandHugh exclusively this afternoon that the 24 year old winger could cost £175,000 to £185,000 per game.
He said: ” Were he to be available for 32 League games which takes account of the two he can’t play against Chelsea and including loan fee, salary, plus National Insurance and agents’ fee it works out as a very big deal.
The figures have been applied to League games only as Cup games aren’t seen as being of the same importance although our source said: “We are going to have a real go in both competitions.”
It will grow to well over £200k per game when you work out how few games he plays in when he can’t get in the team,
The same with Jenkinson,
But that’s the problem when you loan and don’t buy,I wonder how much Carroll has cost per game so far ?
whatever he cost Chelsea they must have got their money back in loan payments. You can see why Chelsea have so many players out on loan. What’s he worth fifteen million? So we get a fifteen million player, but for six million a year. for the same cost we could buy two 15 million players on five year contracts. (6 million x 5 years = 30 million)
Or one 30 million player.
Well if they are quoting it as ‘ were he to be available for the 32 games’,clearly it aint going to be applicable to games he doesnt appear in.The amount cant grow just because he doesnt feature in a game can it.Some of the deal is obviously appearance based 😉
Sam old chap,hows your nappy,staying dry these days,lol.I cracked up yesterday,not that im his biggest fan but i saw Banjo/Monkeys Bellend got it in the neck for possibly being that idiot who comes on here,haha.Aint no way its him.That dumbass on here again was here about 6months ago acting the idiot.If it had been Monkeys Bellend it would have been continous.Felt a bit sorry for the guy actually.We all know it aint him but he gets accused by one of his own,lmao 😀
Haha,my nappies are fine,getting a little damp looking forward to Monday,haha.Leave me out of the disputes mate.I know it aint Banjo,i remember the idiot doing it now from being on here a few months ago also but i would rather stay out of it 😀
Ha,Bellend got his character assasinated with that comment accusing him of being the guy writing the stirring comments on here,lmao.Guess he never read it though,either that or he has a hide as thick as a rhino.That was a vipers tongue attack on him.Poor ******* getting the blame 😀
45 I do not have the knowledge of others about his contract I was just using my standard Maths that I learnt at Primary,
If we did get a deal with pay as play great but I think we will pay even if he never kicks a ball
As for the Village Idiot best ignore him,he will go away and Bake when ignored,
Waiting for another defeat,
Well yeah we will pay a basic loan fee + wages i assume but i should think some of the deal is appearance based & other such clauses.I dont know either.Just what i read above gives that impression.My primary maths also drew me to that conclusion,lol
Football’s awash with so much money nowadays, it doesn’t really matter how much he costs as long as the David’s have budgeted for it.
We have three/four wingers now: Lanzini, Moses, Antonio and Payet (who can play wide). Unless Moses outperforms them in training (and the buzz is that Antonio’s training is “stupendous”), barring injury, Moses will not play every game. Bearing in mind his excellent match v Loserpool, Lanzini would be hard done by if he doesn’t start v Newcastle.