Mark Lawrenson is back with his predictions and Claret and Hugh now puts supporters head to head wth thee BBC pundit.
Lawro says “West Ham are in good shape – really well organised, resilient, and with a threat going forward.
Chelsea have narrowly lost their past two games, at Everton and Wolves but that only backs up what I thought about them already – that they have got the makings of a very good side, but aren’t quite there yet.
This should be a good game, and West Ham will make things difficult for Frank Lampard’s side, but I think it will see the end of this little blip by the Blues.
Lawro’s prediction: 2-0 to Chelsea.
Former Boleyn Ground West Ham DJ Leeon Hyde says “Can’t see us winning unless we change the team around fresh faces and going back to a 3-4-3 Bowen needs a rest Formals for Lanzini I take a 1-1 score draw”
Stellios from Irons United says “1-2 to West Ham. Chelsea are one of the few teams that have an open play, which will suit the style of counter-attacking football Moyes has adopted at West Ham. Haller to continue scoring and Soucek yet another set-piece
David Hauzig Blogger from WestHamTillIIdie.com says “2-1 to Chelsea. They are stronger, deeper, and that will prevail
Filmmaker Canning Town Len says “0-0 I just think we are due one. It could prove to be a good result. Ignore the table, look at the progress.
Moore Than Just A Podcast presenter Nigel Kahn adds ‘1-0 West Ham Early set-piece goal then defend defend, defend’
Gives me hope that Lawro is predicting a Chelski win. He always goes with the favourites and more often than not gets it wrong. Why does anyone still listen to his opinions?