News

The Carlos Tevez saga revisited

|

The memory of Carlos Tevez and the court case that saw West Ham pay £18m in compensation to Sheffield United remains an incendiary issue between the two clubs and both set of fans making Saturday a grudge match.

Tevez’s arrival with Javier Mascherano  at West Ham on transfer deadline day in August 2006 started an unfortunate chain of events. The discovery of the third-party agreements concerning the players that came to light in January 2007 resulted in an independent Premier League commission’s decision to impose a record £5.5m fine rather than a points deduction which caused Kevin McCabe, the Sheffield United chairman to seek legal action after they were relegated that season.

Sheffield United had wanted compensation of up to £45m in lost income but in the end, came to an out-of-court settlement with West Ham that saw the Hammers agree to pay £18m in instalments. The final payment was paid in the summer of 2013.

Share this article

I am Season Ticket Holder in West stand lower at the London Stadium and before that, I used to stand in the Sir Trevor Brooking Lower Row R seat 159 in the Boleyn Ground and in the Eighties I stood on the terraces of the old South Bank. I am a presenter on the West Ham Podcast called MooreThanJustaPodcast.co.uk. A Blogger on WestHamTillIdie.com a member of the West Ham Supporters Advisory Board (SAB), Founder of a Youtube channel called Mr West Ham Football at http://www.youtube.com/MrWestHamFootball,

I am also the associate editor here at Claret and Hugh.

Life Long singer of bubbles! Come on you Irons!

Follow me at @Westhamfootball on twitter

1 comment

  • Cax says:

    It has always bugged me that West Ham paid that compensation when we had breached rules and not laws. The FA Premier League, not West Ham, imposed a fine instead of a points deduction and were therefore culpable in any claim made by Sheff Utd. Had this of gone to the court room I cannot see how West Ham could have been found guilty of RECEIVING an incorrect punishment. My only guess is they employed a very poor (and probably cheap) legal team.

Comments are closed.