Whispers

Ravel: It looks all over…

|

Ravel mRavel Morrison appears to have played his last game for West Ham.

The midfielder –  due back at Upton Park on Boxing Day after a disappointing loan spell at Cardiff City – is not going to receive a new contract offer from the Irons board.

And with only a couple of weeks left before his return, ClaretandHugh has learned there has been little new  interest from anywhere  in taking the player on loan after separate spells at Queens Park Rangers and now with City.

Both Burnley and Leicester City were believed to be interested and ClaretandHugh learned that there had been a “careful” inquiry from Celtic but there has been no follow-up over recent days.

The life and times of Ravel Morrison have dominated the headlines at the club for too long as far as West Ham bosses are concerned,

And one club source told us: “A new contract offer is  as unlikely as it gets. The club will listen to offers for a loan or permanent move and if none are forthcoming there’s a decision to be made.”

Share this article

Hugh Southon is a lifelong Iron and the founding editor of ClaretandHugh. He is a national newspaper journalist of many years experience and was Bobby Moore's 'ghost' writer during the great man's lifetime. He describes ClaretandHugh as "the Hammers daily newspaper!"

Follow on Twitter @hughsouthon

0 comments

  • bubs says:

    Big Sam right again we could have got 5 million for him but so many people thought he was a better bet for the future before the new players arrived,it is not good business to just let him go at his age so I would offer him a 1 year or 2 contract on the terms he has now and make him re learn his trade with the other young men at the club and maybe he will prove everyone wrong.

  • Again? What were the previous occasions – was never rocket science was it?

  • Michael Miller says:

    He’s had his chance and not taken it, all the speculation and nonsensese around him is a distraction from the everyday business that the Management and Board can do without.

    If it was up to me I’d cancel his contract and release him to his own devices.

Comments are closed.